Client satisfaction

Client Feedback

What Clients Say About Working with anantarda

Unfiltered accounts from foreign residents, business owners, and finance directors who have worked with our practice on Thai tax matters.

Back to Home

11+

Years Established

340+

Clients Served

4.8

Average Client Rating

98%

On-Time Filing Rate

Client Reviews

From the People We Work With

"I'd been living in Thailand for six years without filing — a combination of not knowing I needed to and being unsure where to start. James walked me through the situation without any drama. We went back three years. The memorandum he produced for each year made it clear what we'd claimed and why. Sorted, and nothing like as complicated as I'd feared."

DH

David Hartley

Retired, British — Bangkok

March 2025

"We asked anantarda to review our annual CIT filing before submission. The memorandum they delivered flagged two items we'd been handling incorrectly in our intercompany billing — not dramatically, but enough to matter. The written record was useful to present to our board. We'll use them again next year."

SV

Saoirse Vance

Finance Director, Irish — Silom

February 2025

"Setting up our VAT registration was the part of our Thai company setup I felt least certain about. Priya went through the threshold calculation with us, explained when voluntary registration made sense for our type of business, and handled the registration filing. She also suggested a simple invoicing structure we hadn't considered."

MN

Marcus Nilsson

Entrepreneur, Swedish — Sathorn

April 2025

"My situation was a little unusual — pension income from two countries, some rental income here, and a part-time consulting arrangement. The return took a bit longer than a simple employment case but they were thorough and transparent throughout. I saw every figure before it was filed."

FR

François Renaud

Retired consultant, French — Chiang Mai

March 2025

"The corporate review was exactly what our board needed ahead of our first Thai filing. They identified that our management fee arrangement with the Singapore parent hadn't been documented to the standard the Revenue Department expects. Useful to know before an audit, not during one."

AL

Amara Leerattanakit

MD, Thai — Asok

January 2025

"I'd used a general accountant before who wasn't familiar with how the 2024 remittance rules applied to my situation. anantarda knew the detail. James was straightforward about what was clear in the rules and where some uncertainty remained — which I appreciated more than false confidence."

KM

Katherine Morrow

Consultant, Australian — Phuket

April 2025

Case Studies

How Engagements Have Worked in Practice

Case Study 01 — Personal Tax, Late Filing

The Situation

A British retiree had been resident in Thailand for eight years and had never filed a Thai personal income tax return, despite receiving UK pension income remitted to a Thai bank account.

Our Approach

We reviewed the client's residency status, the applicable UK-Thailand double-taxation agreement, and bank records going back four years. We prepared a voluntary disclosure covering three assessable years.

The Outcome

Returns for three years filed without Revenue Department challenge. The client now files annually as a matter of course. Total engagement time: six weeks from document collection to final filing.

"Relief is the right word." — client, January 2025

Case Study 02 — Corporate Review, Related-Party Pricing

The Situation

An SME with a foreign parent company was paying management fees to the parent at a rate set several years prior, without contemporaneous documentation of the arm's-length basis.

Our Approach

We reviewed the transaction against the Revenue Department's guidance on related-party pricing, assessed whether the rate fell within a defensible range, and drafted a transfer pricing memorandum for the client's file.

The Outcome

The client had a documented position before the annual filing and a clear record to present if the arrangement were ever queried. The filing itself proceeded without adjustment. Engagement time: three weeks.

"Exactly the kind of second opinion we needed." — Finance Director, March 2025

Case Study 03 — VAT Registration, Voluntary Registration Decision

The Situation

A Swedish entrepreneur running a digital services business from Bangkok was below the ฿1.8 million mandatory threshold but was considering voluntary registration to recover VAT on significant software costs.

Our Approach

We modelled the input tax recovery position against the client's current and projected revenue mix, reviewed whether any supplies would be zero-rated or exempt, and assessed the administrative cost of monthly filing against the recovery benefit.

The Outcome

Voluntary registration recommended and completed. The client established a simple invoicing template and monthly filing procedure. Estimated annual VAT recovery more than offset advisory and compliance costs. Engagement time: one week.

"Made sense once someone had actually run the numbers." — client, April 2025

Office Contact

Reach the anantarda Team

Telephone

+66 2 491 7635

Office Hours

Mon–Fri 9:00–17:30

Your Turn

Arrange a Conversation

We handle initial enquiries in the same way as any other client matter — with the same attention and the same absence of pressure.

Get in Touch